ClimateSearch

Patos de Minas, Minas Gerais

Brazil · 159k people · 841 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high81°F (27°C)82°F (28°C)80°F (27°C)80°F (27°C)78°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)80°F (27°C)84°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)80°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)
Average low67°F (19°C)67°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)60°F (16°C)58°F (14°C)58°F (14°C)60°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)67°F (19°C)
Dew point66°F (19°C)65°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)58°F (14°C)54°F (12°C)51°F (11°C)50°F (10°C)54°F (12°C)60°F (16°C)65°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)
Rainfall9 in (229 mm)6.1 in (156 mm)6.6 in (169 mm)2.6 in (65 mm)0.9 in (24 mm)0.3 in (9 mm)0.1 in (4 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)1.4 in (36 mm)3.7 in (93 mm)7.9 in (201 mm)9.8 in (250 mm)
Rainy days2117201141126132124
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine297 h293 h303 h313 h308 h296 h316 h333 h332 h328 h280 h294 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

10 21

About 2.0× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • June: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • July: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • August: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
  • November: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.