ClimateSearch

Sanandaj, Kurdistan Province

Iran · 349k people · 1496 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high46°F (8°C)50°F (10°C)62°F (16°C)68°F (20°C)78°F (26°C)92°F (33°C)99°F (37°C)99°F (37°C)89°F (32°C)76°F (24°C)59°F (15°C)52°F (11°C)
Average low26°F (-3°C)28°F (-2°C)37°F (3°C)44°F (6°C)50°F (10°C)58°F (14°C)66°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)53°F (12°C)45°F (7°C)36°F (2°C)32°F (0°C)
Dew point21°F (-6°C)24°F (-4°C)31°F (-1°C)38°F (3°C)40°F (5°C)37°F (3°C)39°F (4°C)37°F (3°C)32°F (0°C)34°F (1°C)31°F (-1°C)25°F (-4°C)
Rainfall3 in (76 mm)2.8 in (70 mm)3.1 in (78 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)1.4 in (37 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)2.7 in (70 mm)2.3 in (59 mm)
Rainy days99101060000587
Snowfall14.2 in (36 cm)12.1 in (30.7 cm)6.9 in (17.5 cm)0.6 in (1.4 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)1.5 in (3.7 cm)9.1 in (23 cm)
Sunshine165 h166 h216 h232 h301 h374 h384 h354 h323 h254 h185 h162 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.8°F (+1.5°C)

Models range from +2.0°F (+1.1°C) to +3.6°F (+2.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

74 → 90

About 1.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • March: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • April: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • May: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • June: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • September: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • December: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.