ClimateSearch

Santa Clara, Villa Clara Province

Cuba · 251k people · 128 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high81°F (27°C)83°F (28°C)85°F (29°C)87°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)90°F (32°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)87°F (31°C)83°F (28°C)82°F (28°C)
Average low62°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)67°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)
Dew point62°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)65°F (18°C)69°F (20°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)67°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)
Rainfall1.7 in (43 mm)1 in (26 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)3 in (76 mm)6.7 in (170 mm)7.4 in (187 mm)5.8 in (146 mm)7.2 in (184 mm)8.7 in (221 mm)7.5 in (191 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)1.3 in (33 mm)
Rainy days413611131113151352
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine216 h223 h250 h261 h247 h202 h247 h231 h196 h195 h196 h211 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +2.4°F (+1.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

45 → 98

About 2.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • July: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • December: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.