ClimateSearch

Santa Luzia, Minas Gerais

Brazil · 219k people · 751 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high85°F (29°C)85°F (30°C)84°F (29°C)83°F (28°C)80°F (26°C)79°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)81°F (27°C)84°F (29°C)85°F (29°C)82°F (28°C)83°F (29°C)
Average low64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)60°F (16°C)55°F (13°C)53°F (12°C)53°F (11°C)54°F (12°C)58°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)63°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)
Dew point65°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)62°F (17°C)57°F (14°C)55°F (13°C)52°F (11°C)52°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)59°F (15°C)63°F (17°C)65°F (19°C)
Rainfall9.6 in (243 mm)6.1 in (155 mm)6.3 in (159 mm)2.3 in (59 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)2.9 in (74 mm)7 in (178 mm)11.8 in (300 mm)
Rainy days14101263111471418
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine168 h182 h197 h211 h217 h215 h232 h251 h232 h209 h157 h155 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.1°F (+0.6°C) to +2.1°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

9 → 18

About 2.0× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • May: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • June: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.