ClimateSearch

São Lourenço da Mata, Pernambuco

Brazil · 118k people · 49 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)85°F (29°C)83°F (28°C)81°F (27°C)80°F (26°C)80°F (27°C)82°F (28°C)84°F (29°C)85°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)
Average low75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)
Dew point71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)69°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)
Rainfall2.2 in (57 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)3.2 in (80 mm)4.2 in (107 mm)4.7 in (120 mm)5.3 in (135 mm)4.8 in (121 mm)2.8 in (72 mm)1.8 in (46 mm)1.3 in (33 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)1.4 in (34 mm)
Rainy days171720212324242016131113
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine351 h316 h337 h313 h320 h299 h313 h332 h341 h365 h354 h362 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.8°C) to +1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

4 6

About 1.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • May: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • October: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.