ClimateSearch

Shaoxing, Zhejiang

China · 2.3M people · 7 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high49°F (10°C)53°F (12°C)61°F (16°C)72°F (22°C)81°F (27°C)85°F (29°C)93°F (34°C)92°F (33°C)84°F (29°C)76°F (24°C)65°F (19°C)54°F (12°C)
Average low35°F (2°C)38°F (4°C)45°F (7°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)70°F (21°C)60°F (16°C)50°F (10°C)38°F (4°C)
Dew point34°F (1°C)37°F (3°C)44°F (7°C)53°F (12°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)58°F (14°C)48°F (9°C)37°F (3°C)
Rainfall2.6 in (65 mm)2.9 in (74 mm)3.8 in (98 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)5.2 in (132 mm)7 in (177 mm)4.9 in (124 mm)5.6 in (143 mm)4.6 in (117 mm)2 in (51 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)
Rainy days91012111011797587
Snowfall2.7 in (6.8 cm)1.7 in (4.2 cm)0.2 in (0.6 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)1.1 in (2.8 cm)
Sunshine110 h101 h105 h119 h134 h98 h171 h179 h149 h159 h124 h140 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.6°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

50 → 72

About 1.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • November: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.