ClimateSearch

Sikasso, Sikasso

Mali · 349k people · 365 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high92°F (33°C)97°F (36°C)100°F (38°C)100°F (38°C)96°F (36°C)91°F (33°C)85°F (30°C)83°F (28°C)85°F (29°C)88°F (31°C)93°F (34°C)92°F (33°C)
Average low65°F (18°C)69°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)78°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)69°F (21°C)65°F (19°C)
Dew point34°F (1°C)33°F (1°C)44°F (7°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)55°F (13°C)40°F (5°C)
Rainfall0.1 in (2 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)1.2 in (31 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)3.6 in (92 mm)7 in (177 mm)10.4 in (264 mm)7.3 in (186 mm)3.2 in (82 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0 in (0 mm)
Rainy days012813162326221510
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine337 h308 h335 h329 h349 h341 h306 h267 h296 h341 h332 h338 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +0.8°F (+0.4°C) to +2.7°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

217 242

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • June: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • October: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • November: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • December: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.