ClimateSearch

Siping, Jilin

China · 556k people · 175 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high19°F (-7°C)29°F (-2°C)44°F (6°C)61°F (16°C)75°F (24°C)82°F (28°C)85°F (30°C)83°F (28°C)75°F (24°C)59°F (15°C)39°F (4°C)23°F (-5°C)
Average low0°F (-18°C)8°F (-13°C)22°F (-5°C)38°F (3°C)51°F (11°C)62°F (17°C)68°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)52°F (11°C)37°F (3°C)20°F (-7°C)4°F (-15°C)
Dew point-5°F (-20°C)1°F (-17°C)10°F (-12°C)26°F (-3°C)41°F (5°C)56°F (14°C)66°F (19°C)65°F (18°C)50°F (10°C)33°F (1°C)15°F (-9°C)1°F (-17°C)
Rainfall0.2 in (5 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)2 in (52 mm)3.6 in (92 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)5.4 in (138 mm)1.8 in (45 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)0.5 in (14 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)
Rainy days11347101096532
Snowfall1.7 in (4.4 cm)2.1 in (5.4 cm)3.3 in (8.5 cm)1 in (2.5 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.7 in (1.7 cm)3.2 in (8.2 cm)2.6 in (6.5 cm)
Sunshine195 h194 h226 h215 h222 h202 h182 h188 h209 h205 h168 h180 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +0.9°F (+0.5°C) to +3.5°F (+1.9°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

3 → 3

Roughly unchanged

Warming by month
  • January: +4.1°F (+2.3°C)
  • February: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • March: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • May: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +3.3°F (+1.9°C)
  • December: +3.7°F (+2.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.