ClimateSearch

Suqian, Jiangsu

China · 1.4M people · 23 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high43°F (6°C)48°F (9°C)58°F (15°C)70°F (21°C)80°F (27°C)86°F (30°C)89°F (32°C)87°F (31°C)81°F (27°C)72°F (22°C)59°F (15°C)47°F (8°C)
Average low27°F (-3°C)31°F (0°C)40°F (4°C)51°F (10°C)61°F (16°C)69°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)66°F (19°C)54°F (12°C)42°F (5°C)30°F (-1°C)
Dew point23°F (-5°C)28°F (-2°C)36°F (2°C)47°F (8°C)56°F (14°C)65°F (19°C)74°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)64°F (18°C)51°F (10°C)39°F (4°C)27°F (-3°C)
Rainfall1.2 in (31 mm)0.8 in (22 mm)0.9 in (24 mm)1.1 in (29 mm)1.6 in (41 mm)4.2 in (107 mm)7.4 in (188 mm)7.2 in (184 mm)2.6 in (65 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)1 in (25 mm)1 in (26 mm)
Rainy days44445610105344
Snowfall2.1 in (5.4 cm)1.5 in (3.7 cm)0.4 in (0.9 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)0.8 in (2 cm)
Sunshine160 h145 h170 h177 h181 h175 h154 h166 h168 h174 h158 h164 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.8°F (+1.0°C) to +2.8°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

27 → 45

About 1.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • February: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • March: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • October: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.