ClimateSearch

Tehuacán, Puebla

Mexico · 249k people · 1638 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high72°F (22°C)76°F (24°C)80°F (27°C)83°F (28°C)81°F (27°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)
Average low49°F (10°C)51°F (11°C)54°F (12°C)58°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)59°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)58°F (14°C)58°F (15°C)56°F (13°C)52°F (11°C)50°F (10°C)
Dew point46°F (8°C)46°F (8°C)47°F (9°C)51°F (11°C)56°F (13°C)58°F (15°C)56°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)58°F (15°C)56°F (13°C)51°F (11°C)47°F (9°C)
Rainfall0.3 in (7 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.7 in (19 mm)1.8 in (45 mm)3.6 in (92 mm)5.3 in (134 mm)2.8 in (71 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)4.5 in (114 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)
Rainy days225814161012151141
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine325 h307 h348 h355 h375 h340 h363 h349 h300 h325 h315 h330 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.7°F (+1.5°C)

Models range from +2.2°F (+1.2°C) to +3.8°F (+2.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

5 11

About 2.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • April: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • May: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • June: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • August: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • September: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.