ClimateSearch

Tumxuk, Xinjiang

China · 136k people · 1098 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high33°F (1°C)44°F (7°C)61°F (16°C)76°F (24°C)84°F (29°C)89°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)88°F (31°C)81°F (27°C)69°F (21°C)52°F (11°C)37°F (3°C)
Average low10°F (-12°C)20°F (-6°C)37°F (3°C)50°F (10°C)58°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)67°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)56°F (13°C)41°F (5°C)27°F (-3°C)15°F (-10°C)
Dew point12°F (-11°C)15°F (-9°C)18°F (-8°C)22°F (-6°C)32°F (0°C)41°F (5°C)47°F (9°C)48°F (9°C)41°F (5°C)31°F (0°C)24°F (-5°C)16°F (-9°C)
Rainfall0 in (1 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.4 in (9 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.4 in (9 mm)0.3 in (9 mm)0.2 in (6 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)
Rainy days000111121000
Snowfall0.4 in (1 cm)0.5 in (1.3 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.4 cm)0.5 in (1.2 cm)
Sunshine173 h175 h212 h232 h245 h267 h297 h277 h246 h236 h187 h170 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.8°F (+1.5°C)

Models range from +2.0°F (+1.1°C) to +3.3°F (+1.8°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

59 → 73

About 1.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • February: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • November: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.