ClimateSearch

Tuxtla, Chiapas

Mexico · 604k people · 531 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high86°F (30°C)90°F (32°C)94°F (34°C)97°F (36°C)97°F (36°C)92°F (34°C)92°F (33°C)91°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)87°F (31°C)86°F (30°C)
Average low61°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)65°F (18°C)69°F (20°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)
Dew point60°F (16°C)60°F (16°C)61°F (16°C)64°F (18°C)68°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)62°F (17°C)
Rainfall0.4 in (9 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)3.7 in (94 mm)9.3 in (236 mm)7.3 in (184 mm)7.5 in (191 mm)9.8 in (250 mm)4.9 in (125 mm)1.6 in (41 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)
Rainy days11129201717211131
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine243 h234 h272 h263 h224 h149 h181 h170 h134 h173 h205 h229 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +2.0°F (+1.1°C) to +3.1°F (+1.7°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

78 → 131

About 1.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • May: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • June: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • November: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.