ClimateSearch

Uberlândia, Minas Gerais

Brazil · 755k people · 863 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high81°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)80°F (27°C)78°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)82°F (28°C)85°F (30°C)85°F (30°C)81°F (27°C)81°F (27°C)
Average low67°F (20°C)67°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)65°F (18°C)60°F (16°C)58°F (15°C)58°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)65°F (18°C)67°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)67°F (20°C)
Dew point66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)62°F (17°C)57°F (14°C)53°F (12°C)50°F (10°C)49°F (10°C)53°F (12°C)60°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)
Rainfall9.4 in (239 mm)7 in (179 mm)6.8 in (172 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)1.7 in (44 mm)4.3 in (108 mm)7.1 in (182 mm)9.7 in (247 mm)
Rainy days2320201142116142024
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine300 h291 h307 h317 h314 h304 h324 h334 h333 h337 h303 h307 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.1°F (+0.6°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

13 24

About 1.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +1.2°F (+0.6°C)
  • June: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • July: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • August: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • September: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • October: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
  • November: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.