ClimateSearch

Uruguaiana, Rio Grande do Sul

Brazil · 121k people · 75 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (31°C)85°F (30°C)82°F (28°C)76°F (25°C)69°F (21°C)65°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)69°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)76°F (25°C)81°F (27°C)86°F (30°C)
Average low71°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)67°F (19°C)62°F (16°C)56°F (13°C)52°F (11°C)50°F (10°C)52°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)60°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)68°F (20°C)
Dew point66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)60°F (15°C)55°F (13°C)52°F (11°C)49°F (9°C)51°F (10°C)53°F (12°C)58°F (14°C)60°F (15°C)63°F (17°C)
Rainfall5.6 in (142 mm)5.1 in (130 mm)4.9 in (124 mm)6.8 in (173 mm)4.7 in (118 mm)4.5 in (114 mm)4.1 in (104 mm)3.4 in (87 mm)5 in (127 mm)7.4 in (189 mm)5.5 in (139 mm)5.4 in (136 mm)
Rainy days1110998988911910
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine359 h298 h307 h250 h233 h208 h235 h258 h260 h290 h323 h353 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.9°F (+1.0°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

29 46

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • July: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.