ClimateSearch

Winejok, Northern Bahr al Ghazal

South Sudan · 300k people · 420 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high97°F (36°C)100°F (38°C)102°F (39°C)103°F (39°C)99°F (37°C)94°F (34°C)91°F (33°C)88°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)95°F (35°C)97°F (36°C)95°F (35°C)
Average low65°F (19°C)69°F (21°C)74°F (23°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)66°F (19°C)
Dew point32°F (0°C)30°F (-1°C)37°F (3°C)56°F (14°C)68°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)52°F (11°C)37°F (3°C)
Rainfall0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.1 in (4 mm)0.7 in (19 mm)2.5 in (65 mm)4 in (102 mm)5.5 in (140 mm)7.5 in (190 mm)4.8 in (121 mm)1.8 in (46 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0 in (0 mm)
Rainy days001369131712400
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine254 h228 h245 h224 h214 h198 h176 h163 h192 h216 h253 h269 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.8°C) to +2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

242 → 262

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.3°F (+0.2°C)
  • February: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • March: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • April: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • September: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • October: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • November: +0.6°F (+0.4°C)
  • December: +0.1°F (+0.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.