ClimateSearch

Wujiaqu, Xinjiang

China · 154k people · 477 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high14°F (-10°C)24°F (-5°C)45°F (7°C)69°F (21°C)81°F (27°C)88°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)89°F (32°C)79°F (26°C)61°F (16°C)40°F (4°C)20°F (-7°C)
Average low-4°F (-20°C)5°F (-15°C)28°F (-2°C)47°F (8°C)58°F (14°C)67°F (19°C)70°F (21°C)67°F (19°C)56°F (13°C)41°F (5°C)25°F (-4°C)5°F (-15°C)
Dew point-1°F (-18°C)9°F (-13°C)22°F (-5°C)29°F (-2°C)35°F (2°C)44°F (7°C)49°F (9°C)47°F (8°C)38°F (4°C)31°F (0°C)21°F (-6°C)5°F (-15°C)
Rainfall0.3 in (7 mm)0.3 in (6 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)0.8 in (20 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.7 in (19 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)0.5 in (12 mm)0.5 in (13 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)
Rainy days112444333332
Snowfall1.2 in (3.1 cm)1.7 in (4.3 cm)1.4 in (3.5 cm)0.5 in (1.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)1.7 in (4.3 cm)2.3 in (5.9 cm)
Sunshine146 h155 h218 h228 h249 h239 h260 h261 h241 h217 h167 h137 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+3.1°F (+1.7°C)

Models range from +2.1°F (+1.2°C) to +3.5°F (+2.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

55 → 69

About 1.3× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • May: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • June: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • July: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • August: +3.6°F (+2.0°C)
  • September: +3.5°F (+1.9°C)
  • October: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • November: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • December: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.