ClimateSearch

Xiamen, Fujian

China · 4.6M people · 12 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high64°F (18°C)64°F (18°C)68°F (20°C)76°F (24°C)82°F (28°C)87°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)91°F (33°C)89°F (32°C)83°F (28°C)76°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)
Average low50°F (10°C)51°F (10°C)55°F (13°C)62°F (17°C)69°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)69°F (20°C)62°F (17°C)54°F (12°C)
Dew point46°F (8°C)49°F (9°C)54°F (12°C)61°F (16°C)69°F (20°C)75°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)72°F (22°C)63°F (17°C)56°F (14°C)49°F (9°C)
Rainfall1.2 in (31 mm)2 in (51 mm)3.2 in (82 mm)3.9 in (99 mm)4.4 in (112 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)5.5 in (140 mm)6.2 in (157 mm)2.8 in (71 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)1.4 in (36 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)
Rainy days471099128105234
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine176 h129 h132 h136 h128 h118 h192 h178 h195 h217 h183 h178 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.2°F (+0.7°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

23 → 47

About 2.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • March: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • October: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.