ClimateSearch

Xiayang, Shanghai

China · 137k people · 5 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high48°F (9°C)51°F (11°C)59°F (15°C)69°F (20°C)77°F (25°C)82°F (28°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (31°C)81°F (27°C)73°F (23°C)64°F (18°C)52°F (11°C)
Average low33°F (1°C)36°F (2°C)42°F (6°C)52°F (11°C)62°F (16°C)69°F (21°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)69°F (21°C)59°F (15°C)49°F (9°C)37°F (3°C)
Dew point32°F (0°C)35°F (2°C)42°F (5°C)51°F (10°C)60°F (16°C)69°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)47°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2.6 in (66 mm)2.5 in (65 mm)3.7 in (94 mm)4.3 in (110 mm)5.2 in (133 mm)10.7 in (273 mm)6.9 in (175 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)3.9 in (98 mm)2.2 in (57 mm)2.3 in (59 mm)1.8 in (45 mm)
Rainy days9912111115151611686
Snowfall1.1 in (2.7 cm)0.9 in (2.3 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.4 in (1 cm)
Sunshine195 h180 h216 h235 h260 h226 h291 h294 h258 h247 h202 h210 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+1.0°C) to +2.6°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

33 58

About 1.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • February: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.