ClimateSearch

Zamora de Hidalgo, Michoacán

Mexico · 186k people · 1571 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high76°F (25°C)80°F (27°C)85°F (29°C)89°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)83°F (28°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)
Average low48°F (9°C)50°F (10°C)53°F (12°C)57°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)61°F (16°C)59°F (15°C)59°F (15°C)58°F (15°C)55°F (13°C)52°F (11°C)49°F (10°C)
Dew point42°F (6°C)42°F (5°C)40°F (4°C)40°F (5°C)49°F (9°C)59°F (15°C)61°F (16°C)61°F (16°C)60°F (16°C)56°F (13°C)50°F (10°C)45°F (7°C)
Rainfall0.7 in (18 mm)0.6 in (14 mm)0.5 in (13 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)7.1 in (179 mm)10.5 in (267 mm)9.7 in (247 mm)8.2 in (207 mm)3.3 in (84 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)0.3 in (9 mm)
Rainy days32228202726231242
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine310 h307 h361 h357 h374 h319 h313 h309 h292 h312 h315 h317 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +2.1°F (+1.2°C) to +3.3°F (+1.9°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

32 56

About 1.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • February: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • March: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +3.0°F (+1.6°C)
  • May: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • June: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.