ClimateSearch

Zhenjiang, Jiangsu

China · 951k people · 28 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high45°F (7°C)50°F (10°C)58°F (15°C)69°F (21°C)78°F (25°C)83°F (28°C)88°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)80°F (27°C)72°F (22°C)61°F (16°C)49°F (10°C)
Average low30°F (-1°C)33°F (1°C)41°F (5°C)51°F (10°C)61°F (16°C)69°F (20°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)67°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)46°F (8°C)34°F (1°C)
Dew point29°F (-2°C)32°F (0°C)40°F (4°C)50°F (10°C)59°F (15°C)68°F (20°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)66°F (19°C)55°F (13°C)44°F (7°C)33°F (0°C)
Rainfall2.1 in (53 mm)2.1 in (52 mm)3 in (77 mm)3.4 in (86 mm)4.4 in (113 mm)8.3 in (212 mm)9.1 in (231 mm)6.8 in (174 mm)3.4 in (87 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)2.2 in (55 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)
Rainy days8810991215159676
Snowfall2.4 in (6.1 cm)1.6 in (4 cm)0.5 in (1.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0.4 in (1 cm)
Sunshine208 h197 h232 h247 h269 h248 h279 h279 h256 h241 h214 h217 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.9°F (+1.1°C) to +2.9°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

28 56

About 2.0× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • February: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.