ClimateSearch

Zhongxiang, Hubei

China · 109k people · 50 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high48°F (9°C)53°F (12°C)62°F (16°C)72°F (22°C)80°F (27°C)85°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)81°F (27°C)73°F (23°C)62°F (17°C)51°F (11°C)
Average low32°F (0°C)36°F (2°C)44°F (7°C)55°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)67°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)46°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)
Dew point29°F (-1°C)34°F (1°C)43°F (6°C)53°F (12°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)65°F (18°C)54°F (12°C)44°F (6°C)33°F (0°C)
Rainfall1.1 in (28 mm)1.4 in (35 mm)2.3 in (58 mm)3.7 in (93 mm)5.1 in (128 mm)7.2 in (182 mm)8.5 in (216 mm)6.1 in (155 mm)3.2 in (80 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)1.8 in (46 mm)0.8 in (20 mm)
Rainy days56910111215149874
Snowfall2.4 in (6 cm)1.2 in (3.1 cm)0.5 in (1.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)0.7 in (1.9 cm)
Sunshine214 h197 h220 h247 h263 h266 h288 h296 h231 h223 h206 h210 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.9°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

34 57

About 1.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • February: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.