ClimateSearch

Zitong, Chongqing

China · 213k people · 257 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high52°F (11°C)56°F (14°C)64°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)79°F (26°C)84°F (29°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)81°F (27°C)71°F (22°C)63°F (17°C)54°F (12°C)
Average low40°F (5°C)43°F (6°C)49°F (10°C)58°F (14°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)69°F (21°C)60°F (16°C)52°F (11°C)43°F (6°C)
Dew point38°F (4°C)42°F (5°C)48°F (9°C)56°F (13°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)67°F (19°C)59°F (15°C)50°F (10°C)41°F (5°C)
Rainfall0.9 in (23 mm)1 in (27 mm)2.1 in (53 mm)3.5 in (89 mm)4.8 in (122 mm)6.8 in (174 mm)7.6 in (194 mm)6.5 in (165 mm)4.8 in (121 mm)3.6 in (91 mm)2 in (52 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)
Rainy days77111214151715141597
Snowfall0.2 in (0.5 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)
Sunshine147 h139 h177 h215 h237 h243 h288 h278 h193 h134 h131 h132 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +1.2°F (+0.7°C) to +3.2°F (+1.8°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

37 70

About 1.9× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • July: +2.1°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +3.5°F (+1.9°C)
  • October: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.