ClimateSearch

Antofagasta, Antofagasta

Chile · 401k people · 13 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high76°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)72°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (19°C)67°F (19°C)68°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)71°F (21°C)73°F (23°C)
Average low65°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)64°F (18°C)62°F (16°C)59°F (15°C)56°F (14°C)55°F (13°C)55°F (13°C)56°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)
Dew point63°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)58°F (15°C)56°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)54°F (12°C)55°F (13°C)56°F (13°C)58°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)
Rainfall0 in (0 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.1 in (4 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (0 mm)
Rainy days000001100000
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine393 h339 h364 h330 h324 h303 h312 h329 h340 h379 h385 h400 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.6°F (+0.9°C) to +1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 0

Warming by month
  • January: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • October: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • November: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.