ClimateSearch

Iquique, Tarapacá

Chile · 200k people · 12 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)75°F (24°C)72°F (22°C)69°F (21°C)65°F (19°C)65°F (18°C)65°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)69°F (20°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)
Average low65°F (18°C)65°F (18°C)63°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)58°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)57°F (14°C)57°F (14°C)58°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)61°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)
Dew point65°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)65°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)60°F (16°C)58°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)56°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)58°F (14°C)60°F (16°C)62°F (17°C)
Rainfall0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (1 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)
Rainy days000000000000
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine248 h227 h259 h230 h217 h186 h188 h200 h208 h235 h250 h261 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.5°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +1.7°F (+1.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 → 0

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • September: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.