ClimateSearch

Arkhangel’sk, Arkhangelskaya

Russia · 350k people · 7 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high18°F (-8°C)20°F (-7°C)30°F (-1°C)43°F (6°C)55°F (13°C)66°F (19°C)72°F (22°C)65°F (19°C)55°F (13°C)41°F (5°C)29°F (-1°C)23°F (-5°C)
Average low5°F (-15°C)6°F (-14°C)15°F (-10°C)26°F (-3°C)36°F (2°C)46°F (8°C)53°F (12°C)48°F (9°C)41°F (5°C)33°F (0°C)20°F (-6°C)11°F (-11°C)
Dew point9°F (-13°C)10°F (-12°C)17°F (-8°C)25°F (-4°C)34°F (1°C)45°F (7°C)52°F (11°C)49°F (10°C)43°F (6°C)33°F (1°C)22°F (-6°C)15°F (-9°C)
Rainfall1.4 in (35 mm)1 in (26 mm)1 in (25 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)1.9 in (48 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)2.4 in (60 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)2.3 in (60 mm)2.4 in (60 mm)1.9 in (48 mm)1.6 in (42 mm)
Rainy days9766910101110111010
Snowfall9.9 in (25.1 cm)7.5 in (19 cm)8 in (20.4 cm)5.4 in (13.7 cm)2.9 in (7.3 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)4.8 in (12.1 cm)9.1 in (23.1 cm)10.4 in (26.4 cm)
Sunshine4 h29 h95 h158 h220 h242 h250 h169 h95 h41 h3 h1 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.4°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +4.6°F (+2.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

—

Too few hot days today to project a reliable change

Warming by month
  • January: +6.6°F (+3.7°C)
  • February: +4.0°F (+2.2°C)
  • March: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • June: +3.1°F (+1.7°C)
  • July: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • August: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +3.5°F (+1.9°C)
  • November: +4.7°F (+2.6°C)
  • December: +5.0°F (+2.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.