ClimateSearch

Armavir, Krasnodar Krai

Russia · 200k people · 199 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high37°F (3°C)40°F (5°C)50°F (10°C)61°F (16°C)70°F (21°C)78°F (26°C)84°F (29°C)85°F (29°C)75°F (24°C)63°F (17°C)49°F (10°C)40°F (5°C)
Average low25°F (-4°C)26°F (-3°C)33°F (1°C)43°F (6°C)53°F (12°C)61°F (16°C)66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)57°F (14°C)47°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)28°F (-2°C)
Dew point25°F (-4°C)26°F (-3°C)33°F (0°C)41°F (5°C)51°F (11°C)57°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)52°F (11°C)45°F (7°C)35°F (2°C)28°F (-2°C)
Rainfall1.8 in (46 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)2.2 in (56 mm)2.4 in (62 mm)3.3 in (83 mm)3.2 in (80 mm)2.5 in (62 mm)1.9 in (49 mm)2.2 in (57 mm)2.3 in (59 mm)2.1 in (54 mm)2 in (51 mm)
Rainy days109121113118789910
Snowfall6.7 in (17.1 cm)5 in (12.7 cm)3.3 in (8.5 cm)0.2 in (0.6 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)2.8 in (7 cm)5.5 in (14 cm)
Sunshine164 h191 h235 h286 h340 h365 h410 h377 h302 h234 h176 h149 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.8°F (+1.0°C) to +2.6°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

17 23

About 1.4× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • April: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • May: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • July: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • August: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.