ClimateSearch

Cai Lậy, Dong Thap

Vietnam · 143k people · 3 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)93°F (34°C)92°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)88°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)88°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)87°F (30°C)
Average low73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)74°F (24°C)
Dew point69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)
Rainfall0.4 in (10 mm)0 in (1 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)1.5 in (37 mm)6.1 in (154 mm)7.1 in (180 mm)6.5 in (165 mm)8 in (204 mm)8 in (203 mm)9.5 in (240 mm)4.3 in (110 mm)1.8 in (45 mm)
Rainy days100314171719192194
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine210 h214 h245 h224 h167 h129 h131 h131 h114 h129 h170 h178 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +3.1°F (+1.7°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

82 → 124

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • February: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • October: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.