ClimateSearch

Cai Lậy, Dong Thap

Vietnam · 143k people · 3 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (30°C)89°F (32°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (34°C)90°F (32°C)87°F (31°C)86°F (30°C)87°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)
Average low72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)
Dew point69°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)
Rainfall1 in (25 mm)0.4 in (11 mm)1.3 in (32 mm)2.9 in (73 mm)7.1 in (179 mm)8.7 in (220 mm)9.4 in (239 mm)10.1 in (255 mm)11.5 in (292 mm)11.8 in (299 mm)5.5 in (141 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)
Rainy days426122427282928271710
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine327 h315 h358 h343 h313 h270 h275 h278 h252 h265 h290 h301 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.0°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +3.1°F (+1.7°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

82 124

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • February: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • September: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • October: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • December: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.