ClimateSearch

Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul

Brazil · 906k people · 590 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high84°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)82°F (28°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)83°F (28°C)86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)84°F (29°C)84°F (29°C)
Average low71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)63°F (17°C)62°F (17°C)61°F (16°C)64°F (18°C)68°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)
Dew point70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)65°F (18°C)59°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)53°F (12°C)52°F (11°C)57°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)69°F (21°C)
Rainfall9.2 in (234 mm)7 in (178 mm)5.7 in (146 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)2.1 in (53 mm)1.1 in (27 mm)1.1 in (29 mm)3.2 in (80 mm)5.2 in (132 mm)5.9 in (150 mm)8 in (204 mm)
Rainy days2422191185448151822
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine318 h291 h325 h302 h291 h282 h300 h315 h299 h324 h320 h331 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.7°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.8°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

27 60

About 2.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • February: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • April: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • May: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • August: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • September: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • October: +3.6°F (+2.0°C)
  • November: +3.0°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.