ClimateSearch

Três Lagoas, Mato Grosso do Sul

Brazil · 144k people · 323 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)87°F (31°C)82°F (28°C)81°F (27°C)82°F (28°C)85°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)89°F (32°C)90°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)
Average low70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)65°F (18°C)59°F (15°C)57°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)59°F (15°C)63°F (17°C)67°F (20°C)69°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)
Dew point72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)67°F (19°C)61°F (16°C)58°F (15°C)55°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)58°F (15°C)66°F (19°C)68°F (20°C)71°F (22°C)
Rainfall9.3 in (236 mm)6.8 in (172 mm)5.8 in (148 mm)2.8 in (70 mm)2.5 in (64 mm)1 in (25 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)2.4 in (60 mm)4.3 in (109 mm)5 in (128 mm)6.8 in (173 mm)
Rainy days17131255222591114
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine174 h174 h204 h215 h213 h215 h237 h250 h223 h209 h197 h191 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.6°F (+0.9°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

76 → 123

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • May: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +3.0°F (+1.6°C)
  • August: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • September: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
  • October: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.