ClimateSearch

Cần Giuộc, Tay Ninh

Vietnam · 152k people · 7 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high87°F (30°C)89°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)92°F (33°C)91°F (33°C)88°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)87°F (31°C)87°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)86°F (30°C)
Average low72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)
Dew point69°F (21°C)69°F (20°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)76°F (24°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)74°F (23°C)71°F (22°C)
Rainfall0.9 in (24 mm)0.4 in (10 mm)0.8 in (21 mm)2.6 in (65 mm)8 in (203 mm)9.9 in (250 mm)9.9 in (251 mm)10.4 in (264 mm)12 in (304 mm)11.1 in (283 mm)5.6 in (144 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)
Rainy days324112527292929271710
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine331 h321 h362 h349 h322 h285 h295 h297 h268 h279 h294 h302 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.4°F (+0.8°C) to +3.7°F (+2.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

86 137

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • February: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.1°F (+1.1°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.