ClimateSearch

Chakwama, Jigawa State

Nigeria · 200k people · 413 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high85°F (30°C)91°F (33°C)98°F (37°C)102°F (39°C)100°F (38°C)95°F (35°C)88°F (31°C)85°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)92°F (34°C)92°F (33°C)87°F (30°C)
Average low57°F (14°C)61°F (16°C)67°F (20°C)74°F (23°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (21°C)64°F (18°C)58°F (15°C)
Dew point29°F (-2°C)27°F (-3°C)28°F (-2°C)43°F (6°C)61°F (16°C)69°F (20°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)62°F (17°C)40°F (4°C)33°F (0°C)
Rainfall0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)1.1 in (28 mm)2.6 in (65 mm)6.4 in (162 mm)9.2 in (235 mm)4.6 in (116 mm)0.9 in (24 mm)0 in (0 mm)0 in (0 mm)
Rainy days0001612212516400
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine340 h310 h340 h342 h355 h340 h320 h285 h311 h348 h337 h339 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.8°F (+1.0°C)

Models range from +1.1°F (+0.6°C) to +2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

209 226

About 1.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +0.6°F (+0.4°C)
  • February: +1.0°F (+0.6°C)
  • March: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • May: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • August: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • September: +0.9°F (+0.5°C)
  • October: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • November: +0.7°F (+0.4°C)
  • December: +0.8°F (+0.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.