ClimateSearch

Chichicastenango, Quiché

Guatemala · 142k people · 2078 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high68°F (20°C)71°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)72°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)69°F (21°C)68°F (20°C)67°F (20°C)68°F (20°C)
Average low51°F (11°C)52°F (11°C)53°F (12°C)55°F (13°C)56°F (14°C)57°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)56°F (13°C)56°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)52°F (11°C)
Dew point50°F (10°C)49°F (10°C)50°F (10°C)53°F (12°C)56°F (13°C)58°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)56°F (14°C)58°F (14°C)56°F (14°C)53°F (12°C)51°F (11°C)
Rainfall0.5 in (14 mm)0.3 in (8 mm)0.7 in (18 mm)2 in (50 mm)6.3 in (159 mm)10.1 in (256 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)7.5 in (189 mm)10.3 in (263 mm)7.3 in (186 mm)2 in (52 mm)0.7 in (17 mm)
Rainy days3251021262324272194
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine316 h303 h346 h340 h313 h276 h314 h316 h278 h285 h287 h308 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +2.0°F (+1.1°C) to +2.6°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 0

Warming by month
  • January: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • October: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • November: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.