ClimateSearch

San Juan Sacatepéquez, Guatemala

Guatemala · 137k people · 1833 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high72°F (22°C)75°F (24°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)76°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)74°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)
Average low51°F (11°C)52°F (11°C)54°F (12°C)56°F (13°C)58°F (14°C)57°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)56°F (14°C)57°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)53°F (12°C)52°F (11°C)
Dew point48°F (9°C)48°F (9°C)49°F (9°C)52°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)55°F (13°C)55°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)56°F (13°C)52°F (11°C)50°F (10°C)
Rainfall0.4 in (9 mm)0.3 in (7 mm)0.7 in (19 mm)2.1 in (53 mm)5.5 in (139 mm)8.8 in (224 mm)5 in (128 mm)5.9 in (149 mm)8.4 in (213 mm)6.5 in (165 mm)1.9 in (49 mm)0.6 in (16 mm)
Rainy days325919251920252094
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine331 h311 h355 h346 h316 h280 h324 h322 h281 h296 h308 h325 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.9°F (+1.0°C) to +3.1°F (+1.7°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

0 0

Warming by month
  • January: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • April: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
  • May: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • October: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • November: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • December: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.