ClimateSearch

Encheng, Guangdong

China · 111k people · 29 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high66°F (19°C)68°F (20°C)73°F (23°C)79°F (26°C)85°F (30°C)89°F (31°C)90°F (32°C)90°F (32°C)88°F (31°C)84°F (29°C)77°F (25°C)69°F (21°C)
Average low53°F (12°C)56°F (13°C)61°F (16°C)68°F (20°C)74°F (23°C)78°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)71°F (21°C)63°F (17°C)55°F (13°C)
Dew point49°F (9°C)54°F (12°C)61°F (16°C)68°F (20°C)74°F (23°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)74°F (23°C)66°F (19°C)57°F (14°C)48°F (9°C)
Rainfall1.5 in (39 mm)1.8 in (47 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)7.3 in (186 mm)12.2 in (311 mm)13.3 in (339 mm)10.3 in (262 mm)14.3 in (362 mm)8.7 in (222 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)1.4 in (34 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)
Rainy days678111719161813444
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine125 h80 h73 h90 h109 h109 h148 h140 h159 h200 h175 h162 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.4°F (+0.8°C)

Models range from +1.0°F (+0.6°C) to +2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

17 → 34

About 2.0× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • March: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • July: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • September: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • October: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.