ClimateSearch

Fukayachō, Saitama

Japan · 141k people · 37 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high45°F (7°C)47°F (8°C)54°F (12°C)63°F (17°C)72°F (22°C)77°F (25°C)83°F (28°C)85°F (29°C)78°F (25°C)68°F (20°C)58°F (15°C)50°F (10°C)
Average low29°F (-2°C)30°F (-1°C)35°F (2°C)45°F (7°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)55°F (13°C)43°F (6°C)34°F (1°C)
Dew point24°F (-4°C)26°F (-4°C)33°F (0°C)43°F (6°C)53°F (12°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)65°F (18°C)54°F (12°C)42°F (6°C)31°F (-1°C)
Rainfall2.1 in (54 mm)2 in (52 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)4.3 in (109 mm)5.2 in (133 mm)6.9 in (176 mm)7.8 in (199 mm)6.1 in (156 mm)8.1 in (205 mm)7.5 in (192 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)1.9 in (47 mm)
Rainy days67121213161817161387
Snowfall4.3 in (10.9 cm)4.2 in (10.6 cm)2 in (5 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0.7 in (1.8 cm)
Sunshine265 h247 h275 h278 h282 h233 h252 h285 h227 h231 h225 h244 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.9°F (+1.1°C) to +2.6°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

10 20

About 2.0× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • May: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • October: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.1°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.