ClimateSearch

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do

South Korea · 1.1M people · 20 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high36°F (2°C)41°F (5°C)51°F (11°C)64°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)80°F (27°C)83°F (29°C)85°F (30°C)79°F (26°C)68°F (20°C)53°F (12°C)39°F (4°C)
Average low18°F (-8°C)23°F (-5°C)32°F (0°C)43°F (6°C)54°F (12°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)61°F (16°C)47°F (8°C)35°F (2°C)22°F (-5°C)
Dew point13°F (-10°C)17°F (-8°C)28°F (-2°C)40°F (4°C)51°F (11°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)60°F (16°C)47°F (8°C)33°F (1°C)19°F (-7°C)
Rainfall0.6 in (16 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)2.5 in (64 mm)3.4 in (87 mm)4.7 in (120 mm)12.8 in (324 mm)11 in (278 mm)5 in (126 mm)1.9 in (47 mm)1.8 in (45 mm)0.8 in (20 mm)
Rainy days33577612106464
Snowfall2.2 in (5.6 cm)1.7 in (4.2 cm)1.1 in (2.8 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.4 in (0.9 cm)1.6 in (4 cm)
Sunshine176 h175 h202 h203 h200 h172 h119 h154 h171 h198 h160 h171 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +1.8°F (+1.0°C) to +2.8°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

3 → 8

About 2.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.