ClimateSearch

Gwangmyeong, Gyeonggi-do

South Korea · 358k people · 28 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high35°F (2°C)40°F (4°C)49°F (10°C)61°F (16°C)70°F (21°C)78°F (26°C)82°F (28°C)83°F (28°C)76°F (25°C)65°F (19°C)51°F (11°C)39°F (4°C)
Average low20°F (-6°C)24°F (-5°C)31°F (0°C)42°F (6°C)53°F (12°C)63°F (17°C)71°F (21°C)72°F (22°C)62°F (17°C)49°F (10°C)36°F (2°C)24°F (-4°C)
Dew point15°F (-10°C)19°F (-7°C)29°F (-2°C)40°F (5°C)52°F (11°C)62°F (17°C)71°F (21°C)71°F (22°C)61°F (16°C)48°F (9°C)34°F (1°C)20°F (-7°C)
Rainfall0.7 in (18 mm)1 in (25 mm)1.4 in (36 mm)2.6 in (65 mm)3.6 in (92 mm)4.8 in (122 mm)12 in (305 mm)9.9 in (252 mm)4.7 in (121 mm)2.1 in (54 mm)1.9 in (48 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)
Rainy days44578815148575
Snowfall2.1 in (5.4 cm)1.5 in (3.9 cm)1 in (2.5 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)1.3 in (3.3 cm)
Sunshine242 h243 h289 h296 h305 h290 h240 h269 h259 h275 h223 h232 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Models range from +1.8°F (+1.0°C) to +2.9°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

3 6

About 2.1× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • February: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.