ClimateSearch

Hejiang, Sichuan

China · 137k people · 237 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high51°F (10°C)56°F (13°C)65°F (18°C)74°F (24°C)81°F (27°C)84°F (29°C)90°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)82°F (28°C)71°F (22°C)63°F (17°C)53°F (12°C)
Average low43°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)53°F (12°C)61°F (16°C)67°F (19°C)71°F (22°C)76°F (25°C)76°F (24°C)70°F (21°C)62°F (17°C)54°F (12°C)46°F (8°C)
Dew point41°F (5°C)44°F (7°C)51°F (10°C)58°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (21°C)75°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)68°F (20°C)60°F (16°C)52°F (11°C)44°F (7°C)
Rainfall0.8 in (20 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)1.4 in (37 mm)2.8 in (72 mm)5.3 in (134 mm)7.1 in (181 mm)6.1 in (155 mm)5.4 in (136 mm)4.8 in (123 mm)3.5 in (90 mm)1.7 in (44 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)
Rainy days558912131110101296
Snowfall0.5 in (1.2 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.3 in (0.7 cm)
Sunshine52 h57 h79 h98 h111 h107 h151 h158 h109 h57 h59 h51 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.4°F (+1.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

44 → 69

About 1.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.9°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • October: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.