ClimateSearch

Jijiang, Chongqing

China · 197k people · 214 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high51°F (11°C)56°F (13°C)65°F (18°C)75°F (24°C)81°F (27°C)85°F (29°C)92°F (33°C)92°F (34°C)83°F (28°C)72°F (22°C)64°F (18°C)53°F (12°C)
Average low43°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)53°F (12°C)61°F (16°C)67°F (19°C)72°F (22°C)77°F (25°C)76°F (25°C)70°F (21°C)62°F (17°C)54°F (12°C)46°F (8°C)
Dew point40°F (5°C)43°F (6°C)50°F (10°C)58°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)75°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)68°F (20°C)60°F (16°C)52°F (11°C)43°F (6°C)
Rainfall0.7 in (17 mm)0.8 in (20 mm)1.5 in (38 mm)3 in (77 mm)5.2 in (133 mm)7.3 in (184 mm)6.9 in (174 mm)5.8 in (146 mm)5.2 in (131 mm)3.4 in (86 mm)1.7 in (44 mm)0.8 in (20 mm)
Rainy days55891112101091185
Snowfall0.2 in (0.4 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)
Sunshine54 h57 h78 h99 h114 h109 h158 h164 h112 h62 h62 h55 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

48 → 71

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • October: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.