ClimateSearch

Jijiang, Chongqing

China · 197k people · 214 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high52°F (11°C)57°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)74°F (23°C)80°F (27°C)84°F (29°C)90°F (32°C)91°F (33°C)82°F (28°C)72°F (22°C)64°F (18°C)54°F (12°C)
Average low43°F (6°C)46°F (8°C)52°F (11°C)59°F (15°C)66°F (19°C)72°F (22°C)77°F (25°C)77°F (25°C)70°F (21°C)62°F (17°C)54°F (12°C)45°F (7°C)
Dew point40°F (5°C)43°F (6°C)50°F (10°C)58°F (15°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)75°F (24°C)73°F (23°C)68°F (20°C)60°F (16°C)52°F (11°C)43°F (6°C)
Rainfall1.2 in (29 mm)1.2 in (31 mm)2.5 in (63 mm)4.1 in (104 mm)5.3 in (135 mm)6.1 in (155 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)5.7 in (145 mm)4.3 in (109 mm)3.7 in (95 mm)2.4 in (60 mm)1.5 in (37 mm)
Rainy days8913151616151513161210
Snowfall0.2 in (0.4 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)
Sunshine121 h124 h164 h199 h224 h228 h293 h282 h204 h133 h125 h117 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

48 71

About 1.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • August: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • October: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • December: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.