ClimateSearch

Ichihara, Chiba

Japan · 284k people · 4 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high48°F (9°C)49°F (10°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)71°F (22°C)76°F (24°C)83°F (28°C)85°F (30°C)79°F (26°C)70°F (21°C)61°F (16°C)52°F (11°C)
Average low37°F (3°C)37°F (3°C)42°F (6°C)51°F (10°C)59°F (15°C)66°F (19°C)73°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)70°F (21°C)61°F (16°C)51°F (11°C)42°F (6°C)
Dew point32°F (0°C)33°F (1°C)39°F (4°C)48°F (9°C)57°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)68°F (20°C)58°F (15°C)49°F (9°C)38°F (3°C)
Rainfall3.4 in (87 mm)3.3 in (83 mm)5.8 in (148 mm)5.3 in (135 mm)5.8 in (147 mm)7.4 in (189 mm)6.2 in (157 mm)4.6 in (118 mm)8.2 in (207 mm)9.9 in (251 mm)4.9 in (124 mm)3.2 in (80 mm)
Rainy days891313121513121514129
Snowfall1 in (2.5 cm)2 in (5 cm)0.6 in (1.4 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)
Sunshine243 h222 h246 h262 h273 h232 h276 h314 h241 h217 h202 h219 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.8°F (+1.0°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

6 14

About 2.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • March: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • October: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.