ClimateSearch

Ichikawa, Chiba

Japan · 497k people · 5 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high47°F (9°C)49°F (9°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)71°F (22°C)76°F (25°C)83°F (28°C)86°F (30°C)79°F (26°C)70°F (21°C)60°F (16°C)52°F (11°C)
Average low33°F (1°C)34°F (1°C)40°F (4°C)49°F (9°C)58°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)75°F (24°C)69°F (21°C)58°F (15°C)48°F (9°C)38°F (3°C)
Dew point30°F (-1°C)31°F (-1°C)38°F (3°C)47°F (8°C)56°F (14°C)64°F (18°C)71°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)67°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)47°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2.7 in (70 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)4.8 in (122 mm)4.5 in (114 mm)5.1 in (130 mm)6.4 in (162 mm)6 in (153 mm)4.5 in (115 mm)7 in (177 mm)8.2 in (209 mm)3.8 in (96 mm)2.5 in (64 mm)
Rainy days781212121414121513108
Snowfall1.6 in (4 cm)2.6 in (6.6 cm)0.9 in (2.3 cm)0 in (0.1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)
Sunshine249 h229 h253 h265 h274 h231 h268 h307 h238 h219 h205 h225 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.8°F (+1.0°C) to +2.5°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

9 20

About 2.3× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • February: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • October: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.