ClimateSearch

Ikoma, Nara

Japan · 121k people · 151 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high48°F (9°C)50°F (10°C)56°F (14°C)67°F (19°C)76°F (24°C)81°F (27°C)88°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)83°F (28°C)73°F (23°C)63°F (17°C)53°F (12°C)
Average low33°F (1°C)34°F (1°C)38°F (4°C)48°F (9°C)57°F (14°C)66°F (19°C)73°F (23°C)75°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)46°F (8°C)37°F (3°C)
Dew point29°F (-2°C)29°F (-1°C)35°F (2°C)44°F (7°C)53°F (12°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)70°F (21°C)64°F (18°C)54°F (12°C)44°F (6°C)34°F (1°C)
Rainfall1.9 in (48 mm)2.3 in (58 mm)4.1 in (105 mm)4.9 in (126 mm)5.4 in (138 mm)7.6 in (194 mm)7.2 in (182 mm)4.8 in (122 mm)7.2 in (184 mm)6.2 in (159 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)1.8 in (45 mm)
Rainy days5710109101069965
Snowfall0.6 in (1.6 cm)1.2 in (3.1 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)
Sunshine167 h151 h172 h169 h172 h124 h163 h216 h164 h168 h161 h167 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+1.0°C) to +2.8°F (+1.6°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

13 → 34

About 2.6× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • November: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • December: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.