ClimateSearch

Isehara, Kanagawa

Japan · 103k people · 37 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high52°F (11°C)53°F (12°C)58°F (15°C)67°F (19°C)74°F (24°C)78°F (26°C)85°F (30°C)88°F (31°C)81°F (27°C)72°F (22°C)64°F (18°C)56°F (13°C)
Average low34°F (1°C)35°F (2°C)41°F (5°C)49°F (10°C)58°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)68°F (20°C)58°F (14°C)47°F (8°C)37°F (3°C)
Dew point30°F (-1°C)31°F (0°C)38°F (3°C)47°F (9°C)57°F (14°C)65°F (18°C)72°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)67°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)47°F (8°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2.3 in (60 mm)2.6 in (66 mm)4.5 in (115 mm)5 in (127 mm)6 in (151 mm)7.9 in (200 mm)6.6 in (168 mm)6.6 in (167 mm)7.9 in (200 mm)8.7 in (220 mm)3.7 in (93 mm)2.7 in (68 mm)
Rainy days78131211121091112107
Snowfall5.7 in (14.5 cm)6.4 in (16.2 cm)3.6 in (9.1 cm)0.3 in (0.8 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.2 in (0.5 cm)1 in (2.6 cm)
Sunshine185 h161 h161 h159 h151 h100 h134 h177 h133 h134 h144 h167 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.9°F (+1.0°C) to +2.4°F (+1.3°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

1 → 2

About 2.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • March: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +2.7°F (+1.5°C)
  • October: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.