ClimateSearch

İzmir, İzmir Province

Turkey · 2.9M people · 114 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high52°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)60°F (16°C)68°F (20°C)78°F (26°C)88°F (31°C)95°F (35°C)95°F (35°C)86°F (30°C)75°F (24°C)64°F (18°C)55°F (13°C)
Average low38°F (3°C)39°F (4°C)42°F (6°C)49°F (9°C)58°F (14°C)66°F (19°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)64°F (18°C)56°F (14°C)48°F (9°C)41°F (5°C)
Dew point38°F (3°C)39°F (4°C)42°F (6°C)47°F (9°C)53°F (12°C)57°F (14°C)58°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)56°F (13°C)53°F (12°C)47°F (8°C)42°F (5°C)
Rainfall4.3 in (108 mm)4 in (100 mm)3.3 in (83 mm)2.4 in (62 mm)1.6 in (40 mm)0.6 in (15 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.2 in (4 mm)0.9 in (24 mm)2.5 in (64 mm)3.7 in (95 mm)4.3 in (109 mm)
Rainy days1010108631136811
Snowfall0.8 in (2.1 cm)0.9 in (2.4 cm)0.4 in (1 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.9 in (2.2 cm)
Sunshine234 h243 h305 h337 h398 h414 h430 h402 h352 h301 h253 h218 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.4°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +3.7°F (+2.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

75 90

About 1.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • April: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
  • October: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • November: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.