ClimateSearch

Konak, İzmir Province

Turkey · 332k people · 81 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high52°F (11°C)55°F (13°C)60°F (16°C)68°F (20°C)78°F (26°C)88°F (31°C)95°F (35°C)95°F (35°C)85°F (30°C)74°F (24°C)64°F (18°C)55°F (13°C)
Average low38°F (3°C)39°F (4°C)42°F (6°C)49°F (9°C)58°F (14°C)66°F (19°C)71°F (22°C)71°F (22°C)64°F (18°C)57°F (14°C)48°F (9°C)41°F (5°C)
Dew point38°F (3°C)39°F (4°C)42°F (6°C)47°F (9°C)54°F (12°C)57°F (14°C)58°F (14°C)59°F (15°C)56°F (14°C)53°F (12°C)47°F (8°C)41°F (5°C)
Rainfall3.8 in (98 mm)3.6 in (90 mm)2.9 in (74 mm)2.2 in (55 mm)1.4 in (37 mm)0.5 in (13 mm)0.1 in (2 mm)0.1 in (3 mm)0.9 in (22 mm)2.4 in (61 mm)3.5 in (89 mm)4 in (102 mm)
Rainy days101098631136811
Snowfall0.6 in (1.4 cm)0.5 in (1.2 cm)0.2 in (0.4 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.4 in (1.1 cm)
Sunshine238 h249 h309 h341 h400 h416 h430 h402 h353 h302 h257 h222 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.4°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.3°F (+0.7°C) to +3.7°F (+2.0°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

72 87

About 1.2× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • March: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • April: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • June: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • July: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +3.4°F (+1.9°C)
  • October: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • November: +1.7°F (+1.0°C)
  • December: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.