ClimateSearch

Jiashan, Zhejiang

China · 137k people · 8 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high47°F (9°C)51°F (11°C)58°F (15°C)68°F (20°C)77°F (25°C)82°F (28°C)90°F (32°C)89°F (32°C)82°F (28°C)73°F (23°C)63°F (17°C)52°F (11°C)
Average low35°F (2°C)37°F (3°C)44°F (6°C)53°F (12°C)62°F (17°C)70°F (21°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (26°C)70°F (21°C)60°F (16°C)50°F (10°C)38°F (4°C)
Dew point33°F (1°C)36°F (2°C)42°F (6°C)51°F (11°C)61°F (16°C)69°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)48°F (9°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2.9 in (73 mm)2.9 in (73 mm)4.5 in (115 mm)4.9 in (124 mm)5.8 in (147 mm)10.7 in (271 mm)6.4 in (162 mm)6 in (152 mm)3.8 in (96 mm)2.3 in (59 mm)2.4 in (62 mm)2.1 in (53 mm)
Rainy days101013111115131511687
Snowfall1.2 in (3 cm)0.8 in (2 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.6 in (1.4 cm)
Sunshine195 h182 h214 h236 h265 h234 h304 h305 h261 h252 h204 h212 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.1°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+1.0°C) to +2.6°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

34 63

About 1.9× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • February: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +3.0°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.