ClimateSearch

Jiaxing, Zhejiang

China · 1.2M people · 9 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high47°F (8°C)51°F (10°C)59°F (15°C)69°F (21°C)78°F (26°C)83°F (28°C)91°F (33°C)90°F (32°C)82°F (28°C)74°F (24°C)64°F (18°C)52°F (11°C)
Average low34°F (1°C)37°F (3°C)44°F (7°C)53°F (12°C)63°F (17°C)71°F (22°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)70°F (21°C)59°F (15°C)49°F (9°C)37°F (3°C)
Dew point33°F (0°C)36°F (2°C)42°F (6°C)51°F (11°C)61°F (16°C)69°F (21°C)76°F (24°C)75°F (24°C)68°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)47°F (9°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall2.6 in (66 mm)2.7 in (69 mm)2.6 in (67 mm)3.1 in (79 mm)4.3 in (110 mm)6.2 in (158 mm)4.6 in (117 mm)5.5 in (141 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)1.1 in (27 mm)2.1 in (55 mm)2.4 in (62 mm)
Rainy days99119810797377
Snowfall1.5 in (3.7 cm)1 in (2.5 cm)0.2 in (0.4 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.6 in (1.6 cm)
Sunshine121 h108 h118 h132 h147 h109 h171 h189 h168 h172 h137 h148 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.2°F (+1.2°C)

Models range from +1.7°F (+1.0°C) to +2.8°F (+1.5°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

35 → 64

About 1.8× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +3.2°F (+1.8°C)
  • February: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • March: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.5°C)
  • May: +1.5°F (+0.9°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • October: +3.0°F (+1.7°C)
  • November: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • December: +3.3°F (+1.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.