ClimateSearch

Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais

Brazil · 541k people · 706 m elevation · Southern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high81°F (27°C)82°F (28°C)80°F (27°C)77°F (25°C)73°F (23°C)72°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)74°F (23°C)77°F (25°C)78°F (26°C)78°F (25°C)80°F (27°C)
Average low67°F (19°C)67°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)58°F (15°C)55°F (13°C)55°F (13°C)56°F (13°C)59°F (15°C)62°F (17°C)64°F (18°C)66°F (19°C)
Dew point66°F (19°C)66°F (19°C)65°F (19°C)63°F (17°C)58°F (15°C)56°F (13°C)54°F (12°C)55°F (13°C)57°F (14°C)61°F (16°C)63°F (17°C)65°F (19°C)
Rainfall13.1 in (332 mm)9.4 in (238 mm)9.2 in (234 mm)3.9 in (100 mm)2.1 in (54 mm)1 in (24 mm)0.9 in (23 mm)1.2 in (30 mm)3 in (75 mm)5.5 in (141 mm)10.8 in (276 mm)12.9 in (329 mm)
Rainy days22182113854610152123
Snowfall0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)
Sunshine288 h284 h296 h278 h265 h258 h255 h274 h257 h264 h254 h285 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+1.3°F (+0.7°C)

Models range from +0.9°F (+0.5°C) to +1.9°F (+1.1°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

3 6

About 2.0× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +1.3°F (+0.7°C)
  • February: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • March: +1.4°F (+0.8°C)
  • April: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • May: +1.1°F (+0.6°C)
  • June: +1.2°F (+0.7°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +1.6°F (+0.9°C)
  • September: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
  • October: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • November: +1.7°F (+0.9°C)
  • December: +1.5°F (+0.8°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.