ClimateSearch

Kukichūō, Saitama

Japan · 151k people · 12 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high46°F (8°C)49°F (9°C)55°F (13°C)65°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)78°F (25°C)84°F (29°C)86°F (30°C)79°F (26°C)69°F (21°C)60°F (16°C)51°F (10°C)
Average low28°F (-2°C)30°F (-1°C)36°F (2°C)46°F (8°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)71°F (22°C)73°F (23°C)67°F (19°C)56°F (13°C)44°F (7°C)34°F (1°C)
Dew point25°F (-4°C)26°F (-3°C)34°F (1°C)44°F (7°C)55°F (13°C)63°F (17°C)71°F (22°C)72°F (22°C)66°F (19°C)55°F (13°C)43°F (6°C)31°F (0°C)
Rainfall2.3 in (57 mm)2.2 in (55 mm)4 in (101 mm)4.1 in (105 mm)5.1 in (130 mm)6.2 in (157 mm)6.3 in (161 mm)4.8 in (121 mm)7.1 in (180 mm)7.8 in (198 mm)3.2 in (81 mm)2.1 in (52 mm)
Rainy days67111112141513141397
Snowfall2.8 in (7 cm)3.1 in (7.8 cm)1.1 in (2.9 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)0.4 in (0.9 cm)
Sunshine257 h238 h261 h267 h272 h223 h250 h290 h229 h220 h213 h233 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +2.0°F (+1.1°C) to +2.6°F (+1.4°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

15 39

About 2.7× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • February: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • March: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • April: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
  • June: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • July: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • August: +2.4°F (+1.4°C)
  • September: +2.8°F (+1.5°C)
  • October: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • November: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.