ClimateSearch

Kurashiki, Okayama

Japan · 484k people · 4 m elevation · Northern Hemisphere

Every month in detail

Thirty-year averages for each calendar month.

Monthly climate normals. Values shown as an em dash are missing from the source data.
MonthJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
Average high49°F (9°C)50°F (10°C)57°F (14°C)67°F (19°C)76°F (24°C)81°F (27°C)89°F (31°C)91°F (33°C)83°F (29°C)73°F (23°C)63°F (17°C)53°F (12°C)
Average low33°F (1°C)34°F (1°C)39°F (4°C)48°F (9°C)57°F (14°C)66°F (19°C)74°F (24°C)76°F (25°C)69°F (20°C)57°F (14°C)46°F (8°C)37°F (3°C)
Dew point31°F (-1°C)32°F (0°C)37°F (3°C)46°F (8°C)56°F (13°C)64°F (18°C)73°F (23°C)73°F (23°C)66°F (19°C)55°F (13°C)45°F (7°C)36°F (2°C)
Rainfall1.6 in (40 mm)1.9 in (49 mm)3.5 in (88 mm)4.7 in (119 mm)5.5 in (140 mm)7.5 in (190 mm)8.5 in (217 mm)4.2 in (107 mm)8.1 in (207 mm)5.1 in (129 mm)2.4 in (60 mm)1.6 in (42 mm)
Rainy days5791099958765
Snowfall0.4 in (1.1 cm)0.6 in (1.5 cm)0.1 in (0.3 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0 in (0 cm)0.1 in (0.2 cm)
Sunshine167 h158 h177 h178 h189 h131 h175 h215 h170 h180 h168 h172 h

Scroll the table sideways for all twelve months.

Projected change, 2031–2050

Model projection, not an observation

How this city’s climate may change, measured against the same models’ own 1995–2014 output. Nothing here affects the match score above.

Change in summer afternoon highs

+2.3°F (+1.3°C)

Models range from +1.5°F (+0.9°C) to +3.2°F (+1.8°C)

Days above 90°F (32°C) a year

15 → 50

About 3.5× as many

Warming by month
  • January: +2.2°F (+1.2°C)
  • February: +1.9°F (+1.1°C)
  • March: +1.8°F (+1.0°C)
  • April: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • May: +2.0°F (+1.1°C)
  • June: +2.1°F (+1.2°C)
  • July: +2.5°F (+1.4°C)
  • August: +2.3°F (+1.3°C)
  • September: +2.9°F (+1.6°C)
  • October: +2.8°F (+1.6°C)
  • November: +2.6°F (+1.4°C)
  • December: +2.4°F (+1.3°C)
Scenario
SSP5-8.5 (high emissions)
Models
4 · CMIP6 HighResMIP, downscaled

This is a high-emissions pathway — the upper end of plausible futures, not a central estimate. Changes are measured by each model against its own past output and then applied to the observed record, which cancels each model’s bias but not the genuine uncertainty about how much warming occurs. Where the models disagree widely, the range above is the honest answer.